11-09-2020 11:04 PM - last edited 3 weeks ago by ROGBot
11-14-2020 06:09 AM
Shamino wrote:
actual received or vid?
you can trim downwards for vf8 as u know, if u have margin
11-14-2020 06:42 AM
11-14-2020 10:02 AM
Shamino wrote:
you can tell the bios for the model from the link names:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kl65p17gjpbiyx4/ROG-STRIX-Z490-I-GAMING-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xng2l0aupm72osv/ROG-STRIX-Z490-H-GAMING-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4esd4hdgnbmr0ra/ROG-STRIX-Z490-G-GAMING-WIFI-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/8q3632jjomgcz5m/ROG-STRIX-Z490-G-GAMING-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hlgyk8vsgc9y019/ROG-STRIX-Z490-F-GAMING-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xk9wssq60pep6xw/ROG-STRIX-Z490-E-GAMING-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/cb2eq4npkkzeulm/ROG-STRIX-Z490-A-GAMING-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/b9xaltbtyxzkrb7/ROG-MAXIMUS-XII-HERO-WIFI-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/bux64zsst87ostu/ROG-MAXIMUS-XII-EXTREME-GUNDAM-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/bnj0o6o49xfn6al/ROG-MAXIMUS-XII-EXTREME-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/388yh4g9s0p6xz3/ROG-MAXIMUS-XII-APEX-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/a60fkicxurkc615/PRIME-Z490-A-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6f35mwxrv5knprv/ROG-MAXIMUS-XII-FORMULA-ASUS-0901.rar?dl=0
11-14-2020 10:17 AM
11-14-2020 12:38 PM
11-14-2020 01:30 PM
11-14-2020 06:56 PM
geneo wrote:
It seems it would be simpler if the adaptive mode's additional turbo voltage (ATV) were independent of the VF curve - that is, VF8 stuck at the native turbo multiplier and only ATV affected the maximum multiplier (above the native turbo). Then you would want the voltage for maximum multiplier to be the maximum of Vf8 (native turbo) and ATV.
For instance, I have a VF curve that is stable at 51x all-core. When I do a OCTVB+1 @ 52x on my 10700k, it drags VF8 to 52x. Since the VF is monotonic increasing, this means 51x is going to run at a lower voltage now instead of VF8+offset since it is interpolated. My OC is unstable not because of the 52x voltage, but because 51x is now running at a lower voltage, So I have to diddle with VF7 and VF8 to get 51x stable again in a non-optimal way. If the VF8 point stuck to 51x, then I would set the voltage I want for 52x via ATV and not have to tangle with the VF curve (ever again)
You must see some down side to this suggestion?
BTW, thanks for posting the tool for manipulating OCTVB, it is very useful for tuning without having to do constant reboots (which I am doing right now). 🙂
EDIT: I think what I am suggesting is the way adaptive used to work before the VF curve was exposed for editing.
11-14-2020 07:18 PM
Shamino wrote:
Vf pt addition never changed how adaptive works. It seems like intel firmware engineers take precautionary measures to ensure what is deemed illogical doesnt take place, hence all these conditions yhat need to be fulfilled before taking effect, but it certainly narrows down your options at times
11-14-2020 08:30 PM
11-14-2020 09:17 PM
RobertoSampaio wrote:
Any frequency above 53x use the adaptive! If it is higher than V/F... This is from intel project...
Now I understood!
is it Right?