11-24-2015
11:10 PM
- last edited on
03-06-2024
01:32 AM
by
ROGBot
11-24-2015 11:14 PM
11-24-2015 11:27 PM
11-25-2015 09:40 AM
Korth wrote:
I went for the Xeon E5-1680-3 proc ...
2) I also realize the R5E mobo isn't specifically engineered for the server market. But do the BIOS workarounds/fixes/errata identified in the Intel Xeon E5-3 Processor Specification Update tend to be fully implemented? (Aside, perhaps, from irrelevant errata involving ECC, RDIMMs, etc.)
11-25-2015 01:35 PM
Korth wrote:
Understand that Haswell-E (Core i7) and Haswell-EP (Xeon) procs are basically interchangeable in this context, mainly because these i7 procs have evolved from (or are actually low-binned E5 parts) built around Xeon-based architectures.
This Intel errata document identifies all sorts of "bugs" within the processor - many of these processor-related issues can't be fixed (yet), many can be fixed (by Intel) in processor microcode revisions, many can be fixed (by mobo manufacturers like Asus) in chipset firmware updates. Many of the errata involve advanced instructions used by things like virtual machines and hypervisors.
Asus is very protective (almost paranoid) with their proprietary firmware, they evidently don't want to give away any advantages to the competition, their documentation is woefully vague. For end-users this means we'll never know whether they've implemented any firmware-level workarounds for processor design flaws which affect hypervisor execution.
11-25-2015 01:38 PM
11-25-2015 02:48 PM
Nate152 wrote:
Does this help you Counteragent?
http://www.howtogeek.com/76532/how-to-install-or-enable-hyper-v-virtualization-in-windows-8/
11-25-2015 01:44 PM
11-25-2015 01:54 PM
11-25-2015 02:14 PM