sergio77 wrote:
Your write results are bit low?
His results are OK...
Solution and difference is here...
If he Increase Cache Frequency for 1500MHz Memory Read Write Speed will go up for more than 10.000 MB/s and more.
Plus overclocking CPU with 8 core and With increasing memory frequency and latency even more could go up 70-70000 MB/s with same memory.
What... Again new BIOS... Mine is still... 0603 😄
sergio77 wrote:
First of all this for naming the colors I think it is child's play, there is no need for that.
We all know how to read the result. I know I had increased Cache Frequency for 1500MHz compared to his settings, but I don't have memory read speed as you wrote increased for the 10.000 MB/s and more.
Of course due to the lower clock speeds his results for the memory read speed are a little lower, but the write speed is much lower.
Vlada011 wrote:
What are you saying with attached graphs? On your graphs processor i7-5960X at stock speeds (without elevated frequencies at the bottom), as MARIODIMAURO has, displayed reading speed 54K and a write speed of 46K. But MARIODIMAURO i7-5960X on defaults showed 64K for reads and 48K for writes.
Graphs with lower memory write speeds are certainly made with some of the older BIOS versions below 2xxx and with lower Intel microcode when most of Haswell-E processors showed lower speed for memory writes in benchmarks. For the BIOS in series 3xxx this difference must be lower (read/write), I confirmed this by testing three different processor on three different motheboards from X99 series. I was not using graphics from benchmarking sites.
From all this I am convinced that the BIOS from 3xxx series works much better with memory, and I thought MARIODIMAURO might try to adjust the settings for memory, as the transition to CR1 with CR2 or 15-17-17 to 15-16-16 / 15-15-15.
Qwinn wrote:
I can confirm what Sergio's saying. I tried my old 3000Mhz OC settings, which used to mostly work (but with some edge stability issues that made me just go back to 2666 XMP) and I'm getting the B7 code as well. Tried 2933 too, same issue. I was able to boot 2800, but that doesn't net me enough gain over 2666 to make going through the whole ordeal of stability testing again worth it.
At least 3301 does give a memory boost all on it's own though. Sergio, there's a good chance you may actually be getting better performance with 2933 on 3301 than with 3000 on 3202. Have you compared?
Yes I have compared results, 3301 has the highest throughput in AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark.
3101
3202
3301
