I realize the R5E is a complex beast filled overflowing with all sorts of technological bells and whistles. The much simpler Asus X99-A is a lot less problematic in many ways. So of course the R5E is harder to build and easier to break.
But I am also a little unnerved ... the R5E is Asus's flagship X99 mobo, their pinnacle of enthusiast gaming overclocking powergear ... and it's damned expensive, lol ... so how come companies like SuperMicro can deliver equally capable and complex power delivery on their comparably priced mobos but Asus cannot? Yes, this one failed R5E may not be representative of all R5Es, and yes it was overclocked (as it was designed to be!), but surely Asus must be able to do better than cheap VRMs without any failsafes?
"All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others." - Douglas Adams
[/Korth]