cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

FurMark score??

Clintlgm
Level 14
Well I'm not really familiar with this benchmark or really fast Video. But this seems like it's less that half of what I should be getting. I am running the latest drivers 306.97 This G75 is not really set up as a gaming computer. I do have lots of software loaded. I did not do a clean install of Win 7. Windows performance is 7.4.
12519 is this a problem, do I need to do something different?

Seems slow here lately so I am putting this up. I'm going to be purchasing a game to learn to play, If I need to get this running better now's the time for me. Not sure what game yet looking for something to get started with that has great graphics, easy to learn so I don't just get discouraged and can be played keyboard only. The last game I played was Descent and I had Descent II but never got anywhere with it, do to no longer having time.
G752VY-DH72 Win 10 Pro
512 GB M.2 Samsung 960 Pro
1 TB Samsung 850 pro 2.5 format
980m GTX 4 GB
32GB DDR 4 Standard RAM

Z97 PRO WiFi I7 4790K
Windows 10 Pro
Z97 -A
Windows 10 Pro
22,216 Views
24 REPLIES 24

c_man
Level 11

Passmark Performance Test ver 8, summery
1253312534

Well this one looks pretty good. I don't have any other testing programs. It still seems furmark and 3D Mark 11 were very slow. I'm wondering if maybe I'm not running them correctly? I see others on here talking about 45 FPS furmark scores. but then maybe that's just with out other software running in the back ground?
G752VY-DH72 Win 10 Pro
512 GB M.2 Samsung 960 Pro
1 TB Samsung 850 pro 2.5 format
980m GTX 4 GB
32GB DDR 4 Standard RAM

Z97 PRO WiFi I7 4790K
Windows 10 Pro
Z97 -A
Windows 10 Pro

Clintlgm wrote:
Well this one looks pretty good. I don't have any other testing programs. It still seems furmark and 3D Mark 11 were very slow. I'm wondering if maybe I'm not running them correctly? I see others on here talking about 45 FPS furmark scores. but then maybe that's just with out other software running in the back ground?


Fur mark is designed to completely max out your GPU and bring it to it's knees, no way any G75 is hitting 45 fps on it. As for 3DMark, are you running these tests while plugged in and using P4G performance setting?

I do have the Power for gear setting to high performance. I always have this notebook plugged in I seldom ever use it on battery
12538
G752VY-DH72 Win 10 Pro
512 GB M.2 Samsung 960 Pro
1 TB Samsung 850 pro 2.5 format
980m GTX 4 GB
32GB DDR 4 Standard RAM

Z97 PRO WiFi I7 4790K
Windows 10 Pro
Z97 -A
Windows 10 Pro

Clintlgm
Level 14
3D Mark 11, score
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12522[/ATTACHH]
G752VY-DH72 Win 10 Pro
512 GB M.2 Samsung 960 Pro
1 TB Samsung 850 pro 2.5 format
980m GTX 4 GB
32GB DDR 4 Standard RAM

Z97 PRO WiFi I7 4790K
Windows 10 Pro
Z97 -A
Windows 10 Pro

c_man
Level 11
You should run the normal test from Basic Edition.

I have no way to compare since I do not own an Advanced Edition.

1256012561125621256312559

This is a basic run Physic looks pretty good to me but the frame rates seem pretty slow for all the other graphics test. All of it was very jerky watching, Stuttering I guess you would call it?
G752VY-DH72 Win 10 Pro
512 GB M.2 Samsung 960 Pro
1 TB Samsung 850 pro 2.5 format
980m GTX 4 GB
32GB DDR 4 Standard RAM

Z97 PRO WiFi I7 4790K
Windows 10 Pro
Z97 -A
Windows 10 Pro

bignazpwns
Level 11
Heres a furmark on a GTX 660m. Left side is overclocked and the right side is stock. A lot of people dont use furmark as a benchmark. They just use it as a tool to check overclocks and temps.

12546


I mean its not that your card is running super slow its in the range of what i seen GTX 670m's hitting but its towards the back end of that.

c_man
Level 11
Your GPU is not working well, can't tell why. At best a driver problem, might even be in a form of conflict with something else. Or some setting who knows where.

Graphics score of 869 is like 2.5 time less than my stock 660M. 670M the way I run it is around 4 times faster.