cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Pg27uq

Neon_Lights
Level 7
MarshallR wrote:
Just checked: PG27 production starts now in May, so mid/late May/early June for first markets depending on how it's being shipped.

Not sure X series yet. It's often mostly waiting for mass-production of panel availability and/or mass production to meet a certain quality standard.

For the record: Monitors don't wait for graphics cards. They just launch on their own schedule.*





My original post:

https://www.inet.se/produkt/2210502/acer-27-predator-x27-4k-144hz-hdr-g-sync-quantum-dot

On this retailer site, the Acer Predator X27 is listed as to be shipped April 5th. Because ASUS usually release their version a little earlier than Acer/the other manufacturers, it is likely that the PG27UQ will be released (assuming that shipping date is correct) during March, this would also still stick to the Q1 2018 release window.


For reference, see the posts in this thread:

http://www.overclock.net/t/1620061/vc-asus-announces-swift-pg27uq-4k-ips-144hz-g-sync-hdr-monitor/10...

http://www.overclock.net/t/1620061/vc-asus-announces-swift-pg27uq-4k-ips-144hz-g-sync-hdr-monitor/11...
1,429,113 Views
1,676 REPLIES 1,676

ELIESEH wrote:
Really? only HDR with 4k ? so no more single GPU 😞


There will be single gpu's releasing that will push 4k I don't know why you all are forgetting about these 32gb hbm2 cards it might be super expensive but they will be releasing 4k cards on a single gpu

bubba123 wrote:
There will be single gpu's releasing that will push 4k I don't know why you all are forgetting about these 32gb hbm2 cards it might be super expensive but they will be releasing 4k cards on a single gpu


Yup, eventually there will be. We'll get cards that can run 4k at 144hz eventually. But I think that is 2-3 generations down the road. I say this because the 1080ti outputs an average of 60fps on most AAA games at their highest/ultra settings on HDR. Generally, the biggest jump in GPUs are like a 70%ish performance increase each generation. So if my speculation is correct at all, I say we'll have to wait until 2022 at the bare minimum.

bubba123 wrote:
There will be single gpu's releasing that will push 4k I don't know why you all are forgetting about these 32gb hbm2 cards it might be super expensive but they will be releasing 4k cards on a single gpu


Not anytime soon.
you forgot that also AAA games will increase in terms of graphics complexity in the future.
There are many AAA games even 1080ti at 1440P cannot run them above 90-100FPS at ultra.
FFXV for example, where there are some areas, Fps drop to 50-60 most of the time.
4K on single GPU needs at least 2-3 generations from now for 120-144 fps. And don't forget, also games can go in graphics intensity way faster than GPU generation.

I was at my local Microcenter today to check out this monitor. Was very surprised when I noticed they have the monitors on discount already! Normally $1999 marked down to $1799. Ended up buying one for the sale price. I was told it’s in store price only.

Edit: was also told they have price drop guarantee. If you bought it from Microcenter in the last 30 days, bring up your receipt and they will give you $200 back if you purchased at $1999

ELIESEH wrote:
Anyone know if there will be a VA HDR monitors with QLED G-SYNC coming ?
especially 2k, i don't like low FPS with 4k.



yes PG35VQ it will be using AUO's VA panel. Should read that tftcentral article.

KOT0005 wrote:
yes PG35VQ it will be using AUO's VA panel. Should read that tftcentral article.


35 inch!!! VA on big screen like this will have a color shift at the edge of the screen because of viewing angle.
Why not 27 inch !!! 27 inch will be perfect for VA and viewing angle will be much better than bigger screen.
It is mandatory each time to have a disadvantage? is this the policy of gaming monitors in the world ?

ELIESEH wrote:
35 inch!!! VA on big screen like this will have a color shift at the edge of the screen because of viewing angle.
Why not 27 inch !!! 27 inch will be perfect for VA and viewing angle will be much better than bigger screen.
It is mandatory each time to have a disadvantage? is this the policy of gaming monitors in the world ?


I own a (AOC) 35" UWQHD VA, honestly the color shift only matters when you're not sitting in front of your screen.

This 'issue' seems to get blown out of proportion whenever the panels debate happens online. I mean, where are you people when you're using your computer? Sitting to the side of it?

F0x135 wrote:
I own a (AOC) 35" UWQHD VA, honestly the color shift only matters when you're not sitting in front of your screen.

This 'issue' seems to get blown out of proportion whenever the panels debate happens online. I mean, where are you people when you're using your computer? Sitting to the side of it?


you understand me wrong, if there is no color shift issue in VA monitors when i sit in front of it, means no problem, I thought even in front of the screen, color shift happened.
Did you preferred the VA more than IPS? Especially blacks, contrast, and colors?
*Thank u*

ELIESEH
Level 11
I am reading some of the posts in this forum.
I don't understand how people can accept a 2500$ monitor with one issue, even minor.
BLB, Glow, Bloom, black crash, and especially the worst ever dead/stuck pixels.
In my opinion, a monitor with that price should be 100% perfect, not even 99.99999%.
1 sub pixel/24883200 Sub pixels not working is not acceptable.
We should not accept one issue with monitor that cost more than a OLED TV.
Can I know why the only electronic part that we should accept one defect in it is the monitor?
Hard to make ? not harder than making silicon ships for CPU or GPU with billions of transistors with 0 error in the circuits inside.
Each time I took the decision of buying the PG27UQ, and read the miserable policy of dead pixels and BLB.... I change my mind :mad::mad::mad:

ELIESEH wrote:
I am reading some of the posts in this forum.
I don't understand how people can accept a 2500$ monitor with one issue, even minor.
BLB, Glow, Bloom, black crash, and especially the worst ever dead/stuck pixels.
In my opinion, a monitor with that price should be 100% perfect, not even 99.99999%.
1 sub pixel/24883200 Sub pixels not working is not acceptable.
We should not accept one issue with monitor that cost more than a OLED TV.
Can I know why the only electronic part that we should accept one defect in it is the monitor?
Hard to make ? not harder than making silicon ships for CPU or GPU with billions of transistors with 0 error in the circuits inside.
Each time I took the decision of buying the PG27UQ, and read the miserable policy of dead pixels and BLB.... I change my mind :mad::mad::mad:


LG customer service is outstanding I have image retention on my oled tv and they are coming out to my home to repair/ replace the unit some people have even received the newer version tv like the 2018 model 1:46 of video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nX0AXzWm2cI