ForCeV wrote:
Wow. That's another good news.!!! well.. I really want to hear that somebody have tried to upgrade a gpu card..no matter what is 660m to 670m or 670m to 670mx(hopefully)
do you have a link where to see a disassembly g75vw model?? and I really want to put thermal paste on my laptop.... but for doing this, I need to take off a keyboard?? I opened a back cover before, but I couldn't see any heat pipe line or cpu and gpu...
I guess it has positioned to the back side.. which means I should take off a keyboard... (then will see??)
well.. then it might be possible to upgrade gtx670mx if it support vbios on it??
because I heard that 670mx card can be overclocking to similar performance like 680m. (670mx card's 3d mark 11 can be reached 5100)
Well!!! I wish we had a good news!!!.
PS) asus has custom form factor isn't it??, how did you buy 670m?? is clevo 670m version possible??
I went to ebay and purchased my 670M there and also had to purchase the Heat sink, 660m and 670m Heat sinks are not alike.
I used IC Diamond thermal paste also.
I asked Dreamonic about this and this is what he said....
Hey Jon,
1-Yes. The 670M is about 15-22% better than the 660M when both cards are overclocked. Basically since the 670M is 192bit, it can handle the 1080p resolution with more eye candy enabled compared to what most 128bit cards experience with at 1080p resolution. Is it more future proof however? Probably not. If you could get your hands on the 670MX and heat sink, that would be ideal, but they are harder to come by online unless purchased directly through ASUS; Usually at a higher premium. The 660M with a high overclock of 1350 on the core, will yield 3800+ on 3DMARK11. The 670M with a high overclock will yield around 4200+ but also 1200+ more on the combined test. The increase in memory bandwidth compared to the 660M is worth it for sure. Just remember that the 670M will run warmer on load so your overclocking room won't be near as high.
2-This is entirely up to you. I chose to go with MX-4 because I've been using the MX series for quite some time with previous NB's and I found with its thermal cycling abilities, it maintained shape and consistency longer. Paste is paste however, but just keep in mind that everyone has a preference, there really is no wrong or right here, unless you use toothpaste!
3-No, the VW models (all of them) have the 660m vBIOS and the 670m vBIOS. So replacing cards is just that. The 670MX however, requires the vBIOS to be inserted for the VW models.
4-This is a confusing area for most people, so I will elaborate. The fan speed and temp parameters are shared among the EC_SC data to the vBIOS data. There is an algorithm used in the vBIOS that is shared with the EC_SC sensors for fan speeds based on the thermal readings it receives from those sensors, that's it! I would recommend not updating your BIOS past .210 or .218 if that is what your machine came with from the factory. The reason being is that updating your BIOS for the sake of it being "newer" is foolish if your system is already running great with its current version. Proper troubleshooting is mandatory when exchanging hardware around, so one step at a time during this process.
5-I didn't need thermal pads when I repasted. The pads themselves are no more thicker than if you were to spot apply paste in replace. If you choose to use thermal pads however, 1mm is what you want. I personally would suggest just pasting it all so as long as you spot apply everything with the right size of bead in all the places the pads were used on. Everyone's results will vary, it's the nature of binning. Make sure to leave the protected film cover on if it is present around your cards GPU (it protects the transistors during paste removal and slight vibrations and expansions/contractions of the PCB.)
Enjoy!
G751JY-DH71|| G75VW || Intel Core i7-4710HQ (2.5GHz || NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M 4GB || |NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M 3GB || 1 TB 7200 rpm Hard Drive, 256 GB Solid-State Drive (PCIEG2) || Intel Core i7-4710HQ (2.5GHz