09-28-2012 01:26 AM - last edited on 03-06-2024 07:16 PM by ROGBot
09-28-2012 04:00 PM
09-28-2012 06:27 PM
mrwolf wrote:
Well the fan noise is pretty normal when its on full power, a little loud but not too much to be irritating. Also because the fan is towards the back and is directed to the back, you dont hear the fan sound too much unless you are behind the laptop lol.. Heat wise its pretty cool, most games,within an ambient room temp of about 25degrees, it hits about 68-72 degrees. When i do max gaming OC its normally at 70-76 degrees 🙂 which is quite decent i would say. But i believe my particular g75vw is a little hotter than others because most people say they get lower temps than mine, still it has never gotten too hot no matter what i throw at it. On furmark burn in test my GPU stabilized at 85 degrees which is the most it will ever ever reach. But then again furmark burn in test is very very extreme and no 3d apps wil ever push it that far..
In my opinion the 660M and its kepler are good in terms of how much power they consume. So it is more efficient and your battery will prob last longer.. But the most you would be able todo is OC is reaally far up to 670M level. If you want the more powerful GPU i would go with 670M as when its OC'd it hit mark wayy past the 675M line
09-29-2012 03:25 AM
bignazpwns wrote:
Yes my Sager can mop the floor with the G75 at full bore.
09-29-2012 06:04 AM
c_man wrote:
Welcome to the club 😛
670M, if the laptop is nor defective, will do a few degrees more than 660M. Both can do 675M numbers without any heat problems.
660M will give you around 25% more battery time if not used 100% load. At full load both have about the same so no real life difference. That "Kepler uses half the energy" will not give you double battery power. I've tested this on quite a few Kepler cards with different manufacturers.
09-29-2012 10:19 AM
jtesq wrote:
Cman, any rumors of if and when Asus might offer the gtx 675M or gtx 680m options?
09-28-2012 09:29 PM
09-29-2012 01:32 AM
09-29-2012 10:34 AM
09-29-2012 11:12 AM
09-29-2012 12:10 PM
jtesq wrote:
Wouldn't oc'ing the 660m sort of defeat the purpose of the Kepler's seemingly advantage over the Fermi based cards with regards to battery performance? I would think in this case one might as well go with the 670m if performance bump is the goal.