cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

G-Sync Drivers Official - NVIDIA

th3l34sh
Level 7
348,436 Views
640 REPLIES 640

asabovesobelow
Level 7
Sorry post twice
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬~ஜ۩۞۩ஜ~▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
SHUT UP AND ENJOY THE D OT A !
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬~ஜ۩۞۩ஜ~▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

liviutatarus
Level 7

liviutatarus wrote:
Directx 11.9 not 12.0...Nvidia fools us again 😞
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidia-wanted-oxide-dev-dx12-benchmark-to-disable-certain-settings....


Yawn... let me know when there is actual DX12 content out there with production drivers or heck at least more than one benchmark. Then let me know when the lack of async compute is confirmed for more than speculation, then let me know if it has any real world performance concerns.

Until then noise like this isn't worth photons used to get it to your eyeballs.

It is very very early to make any judgements performance wise on DX12 particularly for nVidia. If they bring their game like they have done for DX11 you will be happy. Only time will tell. On the AMD side there are indications that AMD's architectural decisions are paying off for them, this is not a negative towards nVidia.

liviutatarus
Level 7
Too much talk, inclined to think that you get paid for Nvidia ...

liviutatarus wrote:
Too much talk, inclined to think that you get paid for Nvidia ...

Seemed unbiased to me. He works for nvidia because he gave an opinion? In that case i find the 980 ti and titan to be superior to the fury x so i probably work for nvidia aswell. No idea why you would post this in the g-sync thread anyways keep it relevant.
3d printed parts and accessories for the G751. You know you want something better than OEM ->https://www.shapeways.com/shops/aeolisio[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

liviutatarus wrote:
Too much talk, inclined to think that you get paid for Nvidia ...


Hahah that is funny I'm no nVidia fanboy much less a shil, you only need to look at my post history.

Also you can't say nVidia has lied, every example you give is questionable at best on more likely provably wrong. I don't even like nVidia as a company ever since since they screwed 3dfx then bought them out during bankruptcy, being objective though:

4GB... yup it has 4GB, and contrary to all of hoopla around the reduced speed of 512MB of that no one can point to a single game and show where it is hurting performance to my knowledge.

No G-Sync on older laptops... well I would be happy if that was a lie, but it isn't happening in any official capacity, certainly a crappy move by nVidia IMO. Not a single unit was ever sold as G-Sync capable and was not.

Full DX12 support... did you even bother reading the article you posted? Even the quoted source isn't sure if it is supported or not... only that he has an email that had request that a feature be removed. This from a source according to many *is* an actual AMD shill. What are other relevant details like what version of the DX12 driver where in play(alpha beta?), when did this happen (date) etc? Nothing substantial was given in that clickbait article. It very well may be true that there will be no async compute on 900 series cards. You certainly cannot confirm that from your posted link.

liviutatarus
Level 7
It's a lie. Repeatedly. 4GB memory gtx970, that would not go G-sync older laptops in June 2015 and full DirectX 12.0 support. I would be glad to know what the lie come from Nvidia the end of this year. Please delete if a moderator believes it has a separate thread.

liviutatarus
Level 7
Joking a bit, let that anger go with g-sync 😄 I said to nerves, crossed my grief now 😄

TugaPower
Level 8

liviutatarus
Level 7
I commented on google +