Cascade lake x next week

[Hopper64]

Just saw this:

*https://wccftech.com/intel-core-i9-109xx-cascade-lake-x-lineup-pricing-launch-date-leaked-coming-oct...

[SGMRock]

zocker wrote:

When the 4,1ghz issue happens in XTU showing current EDP throtteling.

When the cpu runs correctly and under full load @4.6ghz on all cores, and XTU is current EDP throtteling not showing "YES".

I would say its going into a protected mode because your hitting a limit on one of the cores maybe or an overall limit on the CPU as a whole. Instead of all cores to 4.6 maybe you should focus on OC stronger cores first, or one at a time to find the limit for each core.

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000039154/processors/intel-core-processors....

Its really too bad they couldn't get this new line on 10nm they would have had such better clocks and overhead. Then AMD might be winning the core count battle but at least Intel could have maintained the higher clocks. They would have more than a slim lead in the gamer arena.

[Int8bldr]

SGMRock wrote:
I would say its going into a protected mode because your hitting a limit on one of the cores maybe or an overall limit on the CPU as a whole. Instead of all cores to 4.6 maybe you should focus on OC stronger cores first, or one at a time to find the limit for each core.

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000039154/processors/intel-core-processors....

Its really too bad they couldn't get this new line on 10nm they would have had such better clocks and overhead. Then AMD might be winning the core count battle but at least Intel could have maintained the higher clocks. They would have more than a slim lead in the gamer arena.

Could not agree more. Key to good OC of these core i9-109xx with good temps is to find out the behavior of each core individually. Some are temperamental can change temps quickly with increases in voltages and are poor OCs, while others needs little to no extra voltages to OC to 4.8 and beyond.

It's time consuming to find out the temperament of each core individually, but once you have done that you know what you can and cannot do and have excellent temps with normal, AVX and AVX512 workloads achieve excellent OCs (5GHz on water cooling) on many of the cores.

[zocker]

Here are my whole setting actually most is AUTO.....
Before Auto settings, i had tried most thing manually custom voltage etc. and LLC 5 and 6.




I want to stay from watercooling, so i tried the Noctua NH-D15 chromax.black and the Temps are ok for me.
I use HWInfo already.

[Hopper64]

I got my 10900x to 5000, but 5100 gave me blue screens. Ended up at 5000 Vcore 1.35 and was stable in the intel tuning utility stress test. Stable with handbrake which is saying something. In the past I have discovered my system is not tuned properly just by having crashes in handbrake.

My memory is at 4000 with SAV 1.1 and VCCIO 1.1. Manual settings. uncore + 0.40. VDIMM 1.4V. XMP doesn’t even increase the VDIMM past 1.35.

* This encore board starts to post with several Q codes apparent and then stops and boots fine. ?? It does this even at optimized defaults. Bios issue??*

[zocker]

Hopper64 wrote:
VCCIO 1.1.

Where can i find it on my bios?!

[Hopper64]

zocker wrote:
Where can i find it on my bios?!

First page extreme tweaker. *

[Marko911]

Hopper64 wrote:
I got my 10900x to 5000, but 5100 gave me blue screens. Ended up at 5000 Vcore 1.35 and was stable in the intel tuning utility stress test. Stable with handbrake which is saying something. In the past I have discovered my system is not tuned properly just by having crashes in handbrake.

My memory is at 4000 with SAV 1.1 and VCCIO 1.1. Manual settings. uncore + 0.40. VDIMM 1.4V. XMP doesn’t even increase the VDIMM past 1.35.

* This encore board starts to post with several Q codes apparent and then stops and boots fine. ?? It does this even at optimized defaults. Bios issue??*

Is 1.35v safe for skylake-x cpus?

[Hopper64]

VRM stays pretty cool in XTU testing. Quick 5 minutes and VRM didn't go above 39C. Ambient temp is 18C.

[SGMRock]

So all cores to 5.0Ghz on the 10900X? Nice.

[Hopper64]

Yes. I was a bit surprised too. I was expecting it to crash in handbrake. I was shocked when it didn't.