11-13-2016
05:00 AM
- last edited on
03-06-2024
01:25 AM
by
ROGBot
11-13-2016 06:27 AM
11-20-2016 10:47 PM
Chino wrote:
Wait for Kaby Lake. 🙂
11-20-2016 11:19 PM
BlueBolt wrote:
yep. do u know if asus release new mobo for kabylake?
11-22-2016 07:50 AM
11-25-2016 05:50 AM
panzlock wrote:
Will Kaby Lake be a significant enough upgrade from Skylake?
12-05-2016 08:05 AM
quark54 wrote:
This is just my estimate, but from everything I've read. IPC will be up by only 2.5%, but of course the 7700K will turbo to 4.5 GHz. So stock, not overclocking you are looking at a 10% increase over 6700K. If you translate that into frame rate is minuscule. Especially when most of the applications we run are graphics card biased.
Leaked overclocking results suggest the 7600K can overclock to 5.1 GHz at 1.504 Volts. Despite the high voltage, load temp on air cooling was only 46C.
Not confirmed of course and may have been an engineering sample, but that was the report.
http://wccftech.com/...600k-overclock/
Kaby Lake will bring other features too of course, like Intel Optane support. So I say yes, worth it if you want the other features, but not worth it just for a slight increase in performance.
11-25-2016 08:21 AM
12-05-2016 08:18 AM
12-05-2016 09:22 AM
Nate152 wrote:
performance increase will be 5% - 10% over skylake and this is likely due to the higher clock speeds of the kabylake cpu's, I see the kabylake cpu's are good overclockers with Tweaktown showing the 7600k at 5.1GHz with 1.504v, definitely more exciting than skylake.
This should mean the 7700k should easily do over 5.0GHz.
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/54528/core-i7-7700k-hits-6-7ghz-ln2-i5-7600k-5-1ghz-air/index.html