03-18-2013 02:27 AM - last edited on 03-06-2024 09:19 PM by ROGBot
03-19-2013 02:30 AM
03-19-2013 02:50 AM
03-19-2013 07:51 AM
tabuburn wrote:
Weird how Nvidia would not allow the vendors to modify the reference PCB. When you look at the area of the PCB around the power connectors, you can clearly see that there is a placeholder for another 8-pin PCI-e power connector there. If they had added that 8-pin, I could almost say that it would equal the GTX690 in performance or at least come really close.
03-19-2013 12:55 PM
Raja@ASUS wrote:
The power phases are the limiting factor more than an extra 8 pin. Someone already blew a power phase with a volt mod to one of these ref cards.
If over-current at the input were the problem, all that would happen is that the connectors would get hot and we'd see some thermal breakdown at the junctions. The power phases blow way before that happens on these cards and that's not because they are "current starved" 🙂
The extra power connectors are added to meet safe current handling at the power connectors and interconnects. The connector itself is not an active device that limits current on its own accord. Any passive electrical connection will continue to pass current until such time there is a thermal failure. So adding an extra 8 pin, would not help the card OC higher, unless there is sufficient current handling at the VRM and assuming the core is not getting into the realms of clock limitations from other issues.
-Raja
03-19-2013 07:10 PM
03-20-2013 04:27 AM
03-28-2013 10:12 PM