cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

DX12 Time Spy Benchmark Thread

Silent_Scone
Super Moderator
75996
3DMark Time Spy Benchmark Thread


Many games now offer support for DX12 in one way or another. One of the most talked about features within the last two years has been Asynchronous Compute, which TimeSpy implements heavily.

The term Async Compute has become a coined marketing phrase, encompassing DX12 and its granular control of queues and command lists for execution in parallel. With Turing, independent integer and floating-point calculations result in a large boost to performance using these parallel workloads, so now is a good time to compare with previous generations of GPU to see how things stack up.






Future Ray Tracing Support

https://benchmarks.ul.com/news/watch-our-new-directx-raytracing-tech-demo

Raytracing is not a new technique, but until recently it has been too computationally demanding to use in real-time games.
With modern GPUs, it's now possible to use rasterization for most of the rendering and a smaller amount of raytracing to enhance shadows, reflections, and other effects that are difficult to achieve with traditional techniques.
Our DXR tech demo runs in real-time on a single current-generation GPU. As it builds on existing methods, it was relatively easy to implement into our DirectX 12 game engine.
We are proud to be one of the first developers chosen to work with DirectX Raytracing and excited about the opportunities for this new API.
We are happy to announce that we will be using DirectX Raytracing in a new 3DMark benchmark test that we hope to release towards the end of the year.








Submit your score


The rules are simple, please post your a link to your validated 3DMark Score along with the following information:


Standard or Extreme Test
CPU - Model & Overclock
GPU - Model and Boost Clock
Driver Version
Validated 3DMark URL & screenshot
Optional - Memory Speed & Timings


7900X @ 4.7---1080Ti Strix OC @ 2025MHz---4000MHZ----16-17-17-41 1T
Time Spy Standard
Driver 411.63
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/28856954?
75997









Time Spy Standard - 1 GPU



1. DooRules----18280---7980XE @ 5.1GHz----2080Ti @ 2130MHz/2050MHz---4000MHz---16-17-16-36-1T---Time Spy Standard---Driver *---Link

2. CN7----17752---7960X @ 5.3GHz----2080Ti @ 2235MHz/8000MHz---4000MHz---15-16-15-35-1T---Time Spy Standard---Driver *---Link

3. Silent Scone----16207---7900X @ 4.7GHz----2080Ti @ 2130MHz/8000MHz---4000MHz---16-16-16-41-1T---Time Spy Standard---Driver 411.70---Link

4. Rob W.----15870---7980XE @ 4.9 GHZ----TITAN V @ 2137MHz/1030MHz---3600MHZ --- *---Time Spy Standard---Driver 416.16---Link

5. Menthol----14955---8700K @ 5.3 GHZ----2080Ti @ 2040MHz/7700MHz---4266MHZ --- 17-18-18-38 1T---Time Spy Standard---Driver 411.63---Link

6. ThrashZone----11639---7900X @ 4.5 GHZ----Titan Xp @ 2050MHz/1628MHz---3200MHZ --- 16-18-18-38 2T---Time Spy Standard---Driver 416.16---Link

7. Eclipt ----11192---9700K @ 4.9 GHZ----2080 Strix OC @ 2070MHz/7450MHz---3200MHZ --- 16-18-18-36 2T---Time Spy Standard---Driver 416.---Link

8. tunc8686----10588---8700K @ 5.2 GHZ---- Strix 1080Ti OC @1790MHz/*MHz---3300MHZ --- 16-18-18-36 2T---Time Spy Standard---Driver 411.70---Link

9. ThrashZone----10498---5930K @ 4.6 GHZ----1080Ti ftw3 @ 2050MHz/1621MHz---3200MHZ --- 14-14-14-34 1T---Time Spy Standard---Driver 397.64---Link

10. Nate152----10445---7700K @ 5.2 GHZ----TITAN Xp @ 2038MHz1628MHz---300MHZ --- 15-15-15-35 1T---Time Spy Standard---Driver 399.64---Link

11. JPMBoy----8465---8086K @ 5.2 GHZ----1070Ti @ 2100MHz/2250MHz---3200MHZ --- 16-16-16-38 1T---Time Spy Standard---Driver 399.24---Link

12. x-rated----7386---9900K @ 5.0GHZ----2080Ti @ 2190/1945MHz---4200MHZ --- 18-18-18-36 2T---Time Spy Standard---Driver 417.71---Link











Time Spy - 2 GPU


1. JustinThyme----23257---9940X @ 4.8 --- 2080Ti Strix OC @ 2085MHz/1170MHz--- 38000MHz 19-19-19-39 2T---Time Spy Standard---Driver 391.35---Link





Time Spy Extreme- 1 GPU


1. JPMBoy----8464---7980XE @ 4.8 --- Titan V @ 2092MHz/1067MHz--- 4000MHz 16-17-17 1T---Time Spy Standard---Driver 391.35---Link
13900KS / 8000 CAS36 / ROG APEX Z790 / ROG TUF RTX 4090
89,283 Views
87 REPLIES 87

11 192
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/30483313

9700k @ 4.9 --- 2080 Strix OC @ 2070MHz/7450MHz --- 3200MHz --- 16-18-18-36 2T
Time Spy Standard
Driver 416.94

Eclipt wrote:
11 192
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/30483313

9700k @ 4.9 --- 2080 Strix OC @ 2070MHz/7450MHz --- 3200MHz --- 16-18-18-36 2T
Time Spy Standard
Driver 416.94


Nice score

JustinThyme wrote:
Is this limited to single GPUs?


Nope, simply haven't had any dual results yet 🙂
13900KS / 8000 CAS36 / ROG APEX Z790 / ROG TUF RTX 4090

Silent Scone@ASUS wrote:
Nice score



Nope, simply haven't had any dual results yet 🙂


Ok, I’ll get some posted before I tear my rig down over the weekend. Getting a facelift and engine upgrade. *Certain to make some cry that say SLi is dead. *

Going from obsidian 900D to Enthoo Elite and from 7900X to a 9940X. Was contemplating more cores but I let Thrashzone and Artah *talk me into the 14 core instead with a 30 day window to make it or break it. These guys made some compelling arguments. What sealed the deal is the fact that heat is still at play. Unless you are using LN2 or such it’s just hard to get the heat off the die.*



“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, I'm not sure about the former” ~ Albert Einstein

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/67634670

Standard Test
CPU - i5 10400F no o/c
GPU - Asus Dual RTX 3060 Ti
Driver Version 496.13
Validated 3DMark URL & screenshot
Optional - Memory Speed & Timings: 16GB RAM set for XMP 3200 18-18-38, Resize bar enabled.

This system is a new so-called mid-range gaming pc. It could score better with more cpu cooling.

Standard test
i5 10400F no o/c
Asus dual-RTX 3060Ti no o/c
3200MHZ---16-18-18-38 2T
Time Spy Standard
Driver 496.13
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/67651241

Topped my previous score

Standard Test
CPU - i5-10400F @ 2.9 - 4.3
GPU - Asus Dual RTX 3060 Ti Boost Clock 1862
Driver Version 496.76
Validated 3DMark URL & screenshot
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/68597597
Memory Speed & Timings
XMP I 3200 16-18-18-38-2T

Topped it again.

Topped my previous score

Standard Test
CPU - i5-10400F @ 2.9 - 4.3
GPU - Asus Dual RTX 3060 Ti Boost Clock 1854
Driver Version 497.09
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/69592002
XMP I 3200 16-18-18-38-2T

jpmboy
Level 9
TSE (had this saved from a recent team OCN comp - can run anew once this rig gets a break)
7980XE@4.8 --- Titan V @ 2092/1067 --- 32GB@4000c16-17-17
driver 391.35
I also have scores for 1070Ti w/ 2700X (love that card!) 2xTXps... and others to run. 🙂
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/3799269

jpmboy wrote:
TSE (had this saved from a recent team OCN comp - can run anew once this rig gets a break)
7980XE@4.8 --- Titan V @ 2092/1067 --- 32GB@4000c16-17-17
driver 391.35
I also have scores for 1070Ti w/ 2700X (love that card!) 2xTXps... and others to run. 🙂
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/3799269




Nice work as always! Extreme is a different beast as thread count really matters. In the standard bench efficiency and IPC take precedence (which is good for those of us on 10 or lower cores ;))
13900KS / 8000 CAS36 / ROG APEX Z790 / ROG TUF RTX 4090

jpmboy
Level 9
for sure. lower rez, more cpu bound. IDK, I'm itching for a pair of Titan Ts... tho the rtx6000 does not seem to be anything to get real excited about according to the comp guys, but the folks I know in the SFx business are snapping them up!