06-28-2011 02:27 PM
11-14-2011 05:14 PM
Spathi wrote:
I suspect 1.35 will be fine for 10 years. I suspect Intel would say the limit is 1.38, but they have not as yet put this on the webpage. The smaller chips get the more the old rules of thumb go out the window, as these chips are designed to deteriorate over time depending on if you thrash it with a database or not.
As Raja said 1.4 or below is probably OK, but it is up to you. Some people had complete failures at 1.35 and 1.38, but they probably had other bad settings or unlucky chips.
once you go past 1.38V (or whatever it is) you are probably playing with Intels design half life. A certain increase will halve the life of the CPU, so if you care you really want to know what that increase is. People increasing to absolutely what works might be playing with fire or it might be fine depending on how they load it, hard to know who to believe ;oP. If someone has a huge OC though and it fails in a few weeks or a few months, they could then if they were lucky maybe reduce the OC and volts and it might then take twice as long to fail again... eventually they will degrade the CPU and OC to where it has a half life of more than two years and they will call it stable.
Internal PLL overvoltage it lets cores get up past 4.8 more easily (apparently), turn it off and don't worry about it. A PLL is a thing that stabilizes the clock signal from the bus and synchronizes it. I don't get why people say it needs to go higher, but it might have something to do with making the bus signal clearer in the CPU by amplifying the signal.
VccIO depends on your Memory Voltage and what works for your memory and CPUIO. VccIO relates to memory it has no effect on overclocking the actual cores I think.
1.5V ram 1.05 VccIO (or more may be needed for overclocked memory)
1.65V ram 1.15 VccIO (or more may be needed for overclocked memory)
1.25V ram 0.971-1.2 I tested as OK, but 1.05 or below would be it.
It really depends on the memory modules you have and may not even matter. There is a thingie in the CPU IO that sinks unneeded volts from the memory and that is specced at 0.5V.. So you would not want to run VccIO as 1.05 for 1.65V Ram.. but I might be wrong
11-15-2011 11:00 PM
It is a firmware RAID system, rather than hardware RAID or software RAIDhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Rapid_Storage_Technology
11-19-2011 04:32 AM
11-19-2011 05:03 AM
11-19-2011 03:46 PM
11-28-2011 07:37 AM
11-30-2011 03:48 PM
dja2k wrote:
Hey guys, 1st time here, and thanks for this great guide. I've been trying to overclock an Intel i5 2500k and 2x4 Corsair Vengence 1600 mhz. I tried the Windows auto overclock to 4.3ghz and extreme 4.5ghz but those failed. I went to set Bios to 4.2ghz and changed the Ram to 1600 mhz. That seemed to work though my temps jumped from average high 57'c to 72'c on some cores. I have a Cooler Master Hyper 12 Plus with Artic Cooling MX-4 paste. Idle temps are 35'c average using Core Temp. I don't know which temperature reading is accurate as Core Temp, Asus Probe, Bios, etc show different. I am aiming at 4.5ghz if I can, but will need help getting there as I am not too familiar with this board and\or CPU\Memory combo.
What is the normal temp range we should aim for on air cooling?
dja2k
12-01-2011 04:36 AM
12-01-2011 03:57 PM
Raja@ASUS wrote:
If you really want a more accurate reading then it's best to buy a DMM and use the onboard measuring points. To limit overshoot, use a lower LLC setting.