05-02-2014
11:26 AM
- last edited on
03-05-2024
10:25 PM
by
ROGBot
05-02-2014 07:44 PM
05-03-2014 03:02 AM
08-13-2014 02:06 AM
08-13-2014 03:44 AM
08-13-2014 07:06 PM
MeanMachine wrote:Thanx for the info will check on that, but I need to know if I have to do this? being that I believe to have a great built system.
For an improvement in performance, I disabled core parking using the Lasso method.
It is better and easier than modifying your registry imo. Lovely bit of 64bit software.
Check this out: https://bitsum.com/about_cpu_core_parking.php
08-13-2014 07:51 PM
08-13-2014 09:19 PM
08-14-2014 04:05 AM
MeanMachine wrote:Good info here, now I could care less about my energy :cool:, Now this is the thing why I'm asking these questions because I've read multiple threads on different Forums on this and all have different opinions on this Core Parking.
No you don't have to do it EXILE157.
If you are happy with what you have, stick with it. For energy conscious people, Core parking saves a little however I want all cores on demand for gaming. With my setup I noticed a difference using Lasso.
The problem is that Window's default power profiles are configured far too aggressively when it comes to core parking, especially on workstations. A number of complex parameters control when a core should be parked, and Microsoft tuned heavily towards power savings.
The core parking settings in Windows are implemented as parameters of power plans (aka power profiles). That means you can, for example, disable core parking for the High Performance power plan, but leave it enabled for other plans. And that is exactly the desired tweak for most users: disable parking only for high performance power plans.
08-14-2014 06:21 AM