Overclocking – overview First off, we need to discuss overclocking the Sandy Bridge chips before we move onto the actual results because things are very different now from previous generation processor.
As far as overclocking goes now, Intel has changed the rules, plain and simple. There are some significant differences, and we'll try to break these down succinctly in order to best understand the methods and implications of what can be done (or not) in terms of overclocking.
The first thing to understand is that the locked CPU models have limited overclocking: 2400, 2500, and 2600. The K-models such as 2500K, 2600K and the new 2700K can be overclocked significantly, and for a modest price increase, we recommend the K models over the regular chips.
The second thing to understand here is that the BCLK of 100 can be increased only slightly. Unlike the old days where a 450 FSB was possible, and a 220 BCLK was achievable on a Core i7 900, Sandy Bridge boards will only hit about 109 BLCK at most. The bus cannot be changed much at all, which is why the locked chips cannot be overclocked much due to their limited multiplier and minimal BCLK movement.
Essentially, non-K CPUs will therefore have very limited overclocking, end of story. Since overclocking Sandy Bridge is more reliant on the multiplier, the unlocked K-series chips can be pushed much farther even though the BCLK has little wiggle room.
The next major difference is that Turbo now comes into play very heavily. Even the base 2400 has a Turbo Mode that will inherently act like an overclocked situation. The Turbo will boost the multi on the chip when under load, like an "insta-OC". Linked to all this is that C1E, EIST, and Speedstep must be left ON. Unlike all previous generation processors that overclocked better with these turned off, that has now changed and these "speed adjusting" settings must be enabled.
Another critical point in overclocking Sandy Bridge is that all K-series chips have a multiplier wall. Previous generation Intel CPUs responded to increased voltage and lower temperatures to achieve higher clock speeds. That is no longer the case. A chip has a maximum multiplier it will achieve; additional voltage or lower temperatures will not improve the results. As mentioned, there is currently D1 and D2 stepping, and the D1 is preferred. Each chip will have an inherently different multiplier wall. Essentially this means that voltage, temperatures, and motherboard model will not make a difference in the maximum overclock of a particular chip; it all depends on the chip now.
Therefore, this also means that sub-zero cooling with dry ice or liquid nitrogen will no longer help improve overclocking results. In fact, Sandy Bridge chips will down clock and will lose performance scaling when very low temperatures are applied. As a result, air cooling is all that's really necessary to hit the maximum overclock on a particular chip. Water cooling will help keep load temperatures lower, but will not produce a higher multiplier.
So, despite having an unlocked K-series CPU, you may reach the maximum multiplier regardless of the cooling used or voltage applied. There is a bit of wiggle room to tweak the BLCK to squeeze a bit more out of a chip to hit the magical 5GHz if you have a cherry chip to begin with, but the days of juicing up a cheap chip to insane speeds are pretty much over.
Let's take a look at our overclocking results now.
My Test System:· Processor: Intel i7 2600K
· Cooler: XSPC 750 kit
· Motherboard: ASSUS P8Z68 Deluxe
· RAM: G-Skill 8GB DDR3 1600
· Hard Drive: OCZ Onyx 32GB and WD 320GB
· Optical Drive: ASUS DVD±R
· Operating System: Windows 7 Home Pre x64
Auto Tuning
Opening up the AI Suite II software I selected TurboV EVO and you will find two choices, “Fast” or “Extreme”. Throwing caution to the wind I hit “Extreme” and then start.
As the process continues with a few reboots and the P8Z68 Deluxe runs its own stability testing you will see these screens and you have the option to stop the process and accept the current level of OC or just sit back and watch as the process continues until the system finds a “Happy Place”. So I let the system continue hoping for a 4.7 or maybe a 4.8GHz.
My 2600K is just one of the “run of the mill chips”; I wish I had one of the few that are proving to be the “cream of the crop” capable of hitting 5GHz or more.
TurboV EVO auto tuning finally settled in at 4532MHz which is nothing to be ashamed of. The entire process took less than 10 minutes of well spent time.
Manual Overclocking As you know, you might have a little headroom in your BCLK to play with but you won’t get much more than the 100 MHz and then playing with voltages and your multipliers you might break that 5.0GHz ceiling.
I decided to leave the BCLK at 100MHz and bump the multiplier up to 50 and then finding the Core Voltage where the system would run stable which in my case is 1.480. I managed to hit 5000.5MHz which I stressed with AIDA64 for 1 hour.
With my adventures at overclocking the P8Z68 Deluxe with my average performing 2600K I am satisfied that the Auto OC abilities are great at finding a decent OC without any user intervention other than selecting your option and clicking start.
I used an OC of 4800MHz while running the benchmarking tests for this review.
Well, that wraps up my review for the P8Z68 Deluxe board so let’s move on to the summary…