cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Samsung 990 Pro Vs Crucial T705

Hopper64
Level 15

I decided to test the older Samsung 990 Pro vs the newer Crucial T705 on this Encore board just to see what Valley benchmarks would be like going from X16 with the former to X8 bandwidth with the latter with a 3080 on my test bench. I was not expecting that the FPS max and min would actually be higher with the crucial product. I was expecting a modest decline. Overall synthetic score was lower but the min and mas FPS were higher. Quite remarkable. Before and after in order here:

Valley Baseline 042724.pngValley T705 042824.pngcdm.pngcdm T705.png

MZ790A Bios 2002, GSkill F5-8000J3848H16GX2-TZRK, 13900KS, EKWB D5 TBE 300, Seasonic Prime TX-1600 ATX 3.0, Asus Strix 4090 w/ Optimus block, Phanteks Enthoo Elite, Asus Claymore 2, Asus Gladius 3, Asus XG349C, Samsung 990, Windows 11 Pro
343 Views
1 REPLY 1

Hopper64
Level 15

Before and after:

GPU Z.pngGPU Z T705.png

MZ790A Bios 2002, GSkill F5-8000J3848H16GX2-TZRK, 13900KS, EKWB D5 TBE 300, Seasonic Prime TX-1600 ATX 3.0, Asus Strix 4090 w/ Optimus block, Phanteks Enthoo Elite, Asus Claymore 2, Asus Gladius 3, Asus XG349C, Samsung 990, Windows 11 Pro