cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

RaptorLake Resources

Shamino
Moderator

i will use this as a collection of test bioses/tools/info targeted towards Raptorlake + z69/790

NOTE for Z690: You must update ME on your Z690 to properly support raptorlake (if you are on dual bioses then you need to do this to both bioses)

1) d/l and install ME driver
https://dlcdnets.asus.com/pub/ASUS/mb/03CHIPSET/DRV_MEI_Intel_Cons_ADL_TP_W11_64_V2229320_20220809B....

2) update ME with ME Update Tool (I know there are newer versions but its not up on Asus official site yet so >= this version is fine)
https://dlcdnets.asus.com/pub/ASUS/mb/03CHIPSET/MEUpdateTool_16.1.25.1885_T.zip

3) update to Latest BIOS of your choice

Note 2 for Z690: i have some Z690s that are already LOW in battery so you are advised to use a new Battery during this upgrade.

New test bioses

Z690 Apex

Z690 Extreme

Z690 Hero

Z690 Hero Eva

Z690 Extreme Glacial

Z690 Formula

Z690 Strix E

Z690 Strix F

Z690 Strix G

Z690 Strix A WIFI D4

Z690 Strix A WIFI

Z690 Strix I

Z690 Creator

Z690 Prime A

Z690 Tuf

Z690 Tuf D4

Z690 Tuf WIFI

Z690 Tuf D4 WIFI

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Z790 Extreme

Z790 Hero

Z790 Apex

Z790 Strix I

Z790 Strix F

Z790 Strix E

Z790 Strix A D4

Z790 Strix A

Z790 ProArt

Z790 Strix H

Z790 Prime A WIFI

Z790 Prime M Plus D4

Z790 Prime P

Z790 Prime P D4

Z790 Prime P WIFI

Z790 Prime P WIFI D4

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Latest ocpak

Turbovcore
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ifsr8x0zncxcvyd/TurboV_Core_1.10.20.zip?dl=0


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1,295 Views
758 REPLIES 758

Vatergascoigne
Level 10

Hello everyone,
What about the claim that the 0x129 VID fix only works when the Intel profiles are loaded, but not with individual settings?
There was this video from buildzoid.
Is that actually the case?

He tested it on a Gigabyte board. If that is how Intel intended the AC loadlines to work and Asus follows these rules too then...

Lol, I would take what tech tubers say with a grain of salt. 

Definitely, but could ASUS comment on this?!

Anyone know how long until the official bios version is ready?

I'd rather wait for official than use beta especially with a new microcode. Rather get the official and be done with it.

Most of the Asus bioses are beta, there is absolutely nothing to worry about. The official bios will most probably be based on or the same as the beta anyway. 

i have been on every beta since launch of Z690 and Z790 with zero issues.

> i have been on every beta since launch of Z690 and Z790 with zero issues.

I've been upgrading to the official releases only and I can't say my experience was smooth. You can see problem reports in this very thread already.

This is not an assertion, but rather a fact. Intel has now set the standards (which was not the case to this extent before) and even here has set 2 profiles (for the I9s of the 13th and 14th generation) "Performance" and "Extreme". Intel's specifications are adhered to here and 0x129 works accordingly.

However, if you want to use "Asus Advanced OC Profile", then the settings from Asus and their AI apply, but this has always been the case.

Everyone should be aware that if you use OC, regardless of whether it is "Asus AI OC" or manual OC, you are circumventing the Intel specifications. But this has always been the case.

Even XMP is considered OC, but only for RAM and RAM controllers in the CPU.

However, Asus will set appropriate specifications for its AI OC that will not immediately fry the CPU.

If you want absolute performance that is only possible with OC, you have to remember that any CPU, regardless of whether it is Intel or AMD, can degenerate more quickly.

With the older microcodes that still had Intel's voltage bug, the settings in the UEFI were bypassed and the CPU could request high voltages despite other settings. That was the problem up to now, that despite other UEFI settings, the CPU could call up higher vids and visibly also received them in some cases.
And that is exactly what is fixed with 0x129, but only as long as you are in Intel default mode.

In addition, Intel vids with 1.1V are simply not possible with OC and have never been, unless you also run UV.

Higher clock speed = higher voltage and watts.
The Asus OC profile simply tries to get the best out of lower voltage compared to moderate temperatures. Nothing more and nothing less.

However, today's OC is no longer comparable with OC from earlier times, as the CPUs are already running at the upper limit when they are then released.
In addition, there should be a competent cooling system, otherwise the CPU will simply become unstable, which has always been the case.

Basically, if you want to OC, you should study the topic intensively and not just set a few settings without knowing exactly what will change.

Intel Core i7 13700K / AiO Fractal Design Lumen S36 v2 RGB / Asus Rog Strix Z790-F Gaming WIFI / Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR5-5600 64GB (4x 16GB) / Asus TUF RTX 4070 ti OC / 4x Samsung 980 pro 1TB / Seasonic Prime GX 850 W Gold / Fractal Design Meshify 2 Lite RGB Black TG Light Tint / Monitor AOC Q27G2S/EU (WQHD)

I absolutely agree and confirm every statement you make.
Of course, ASUS OC bypasses Intel specifications to ensure higher performance.
What I find a bit strange after spending some time with the Intel profiles is that the VID and Vcore are consistently higher.
Regardless of whether the Intel Performance or Extreme Profile is used.
But the LLC's and other more conservative settings will probably play a role...

Correct, Intel Defaults uses higher LL

13900KS / 8000 CAS36 / ROG APEX Z790 / ROG TUF RTX 4090