05-26-2018 08:02 PM - last edited on 03-06-2024 08:40 PM by ROGBot
05-26-2018 08:17 PM
davemon50 wrote:
There's an improvement running your games off the M.2 SSD. I run all mine off SSD.
05-27-2018 06:54 AM
05-27-2018 06:27 PM
davemon50 wrote:
Yeah, small improvement I think but I have never run my games off the SATA SSD's that I have in my desktop machine, so can't comment on benchmarking those.
05-27-2018 07:31 AM
05-27-2018 07:33 AM
Weirdoutworld wrote:
You want your OS on the ssd. Its not just the boot time that improves. In gaming you will only see a slight difference in loading times. Very little gaming gains going from HDD - sata3.
No offense but Its almost silly to want your OS on the HDD & games on SSD.
05-27-2018 06:22 PM
Weirdoutworld wrote:
You want your OS on the ssd. Its not just the boot time that improves. In gaming you will only see a slight difference in loading times. Very little gaming gains going from HDD - sata3.
No offense but Its almost silly to want your OS on the HDD & games on SSD.
05-27-2018 07:21 PM
rhufus wrote:
I've never had a system with an SSD yet but I would figure from a failure possibility the SSD would possibly fail before the HDD would; I've only experienced 1 HDD failure in 20 years. How would having the Games on the SSD not increase loading and map transition times even if the OS was installed on the HDD?. I understand the registry entries for the games would be on the platter drive, but the games themselves being on the SSD seems like it would work rather well. I welcome your input; If you would explain further why it would be a bad idea I would appreciate it.
05-27-2018 07:53 PM
davemon50 wrote:
I have heard rumors that SSD's fail on much use. Like you, I've never had an HDD failure, for me it's been almost 30 years, I've been computing since college.