cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Gaming in 2560x1440

CraZeeY
Level 7
Hello guys!

Anyone here gaming in 2560x1440? If so, how it is compared to 1920x1080? Been thinking about adding a second 7970 and getting a Asus 27" PB278Q. How much of a difference is it?
343 Views
12 REPLIES 12

foana wrote:
What games are you planning on going crossfired 7970s @ 1440 for? In example, I have crossfired 7950s both OCd to 1000mhz core, for some reason I can't OC the memory clocks but that is besides the point. In BF3 2560x1440 with no aa and everything ultra I get 120+ fps down to high 90s in intense situations. I currently run a Yamakasi Catleap 2B Extreme OC monitor (2560x1440) and I have been able to OC it to 129hz, at 130hz I hit the PCB limit and the screen flashes black, for longevity of the PCB I have downclocked it to 120hz. This is definitely the best monitor you can get at the moment, no other monitor can do 1440 @ 120hz. It uses the same LG panels that come in the Apple Thunderbolt displays, except that they are A- or A rated panels so you have a chance of getting dead/bright/stuck pixels. Personally I had 1 bright stuck pixel on the middle right side which I was able to resolve by rubbing it with a cloth.

imo, if you're going for crossfired 7970s you would want this monitor. If not, then you can get pretty much get exactly the same monitor with no OC potential, so only 60hz 1440, at around the $400 range, which has the same LG panel.

For more information on the OC model you should read up on them at 120hz.net you will not be disappointed.

edit Forgot to mention the low input lag from only having a DVI-D input and no OSD


I did look in to the catleap before the asus one to be honest. The catleap would set me back at ~~830-850 usd compared to the asus one at ~~770 so I decided that the Asus would be a better purchase for me. I don't play alot fps games so 120 hz isn't really needed or thaat tempting

CraZeeY wrote:
I did look in to the catleap before the asus one to be honest. The catleap would set me back at ~~830-850 usd compared to the asus one at ~~770 so I decided that the Asus would be a better purchase for me. I don't play alot fps games so 120 hz isn't really needed or thaat tempting


If 120hz+ isn't your thing then maybe consider the non-OC model. I have not purchased one myself but they use the same LG panel which is IPS vs PLS from the Asus. You could probably pick one up in the $400 dollar range, saving ~$300, which could be spent on that extra card. If you are using the monitor mainly for gaming then you will not notice dead/bright/stuck pixels at all. 120hz.net does not handle these though and your best bet would be to check greensum on ebay.
3930K
RIVF
2 x HD7950 1100/1250
16Gb G.SKILL RipjawsZ 2133Mhz
2 x Samsung 840 Pro 256Gb Raid0, OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS 120Gb
2 x 2Tb WD Caviar Black, WD Raptor 150Gb
Seasonic X-1250
HAFX
XSPC AX360 3 x Scythe GT 1850
Yamakasi Catleap 2B 2560x1440@124hz
Windows 7 x64

Adhy_Dharma_FN
Level 7
what game supported 2560 X 1440 resolution?
Next Build
- AMD Vishera FX-8350
- AMD Radeon HD 7870