cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

X670 / X870 resource thread

Shamino
Moderator

ill use this thread to collect some new test bioses for the boards, maybe also to explain some less understood options

to disable cores ccd go here and choose ccd xx bit map down core.
each ones stand for an enabled core
best to disable from the back, ie:
110000
instead of 0011000
after selection press downcore apply changes or discard if made mistake

ocpak/octools

FAQ:
7950x not boosting pass 5.5G -> check that CStates is not disabled
Detailed Explanation on CState Boot Limiter


Test BIOSes:

Spoiler

new:
X3D OC Preset for those MB with asynch BCLK Support: (for simple slight perf boost for X3D)
97792

DOCP/EXPO Tweaked: (for simple timings tightening)
97793

strixe-e 1515 

strixe-f 1515 

strix e a 1515 

crosshair hero 1515 

crosshair gene 1515 

crosshair extreme 1515 

creator 670 1515

creator b650 1515

strix 650E I

strix 670 itx

 

 

for crosshair and strix e-e:

explanation of segment2 Loadline:

dualseg.jpg

customize a heterogenous loadline for a dual segment workload range.

example above shows loadline=L6 when current is in range of 0~40A, and Level4 when current is above 40A.

 

 

 


Adds for x3d

dynamic ccd priority switch with core flex, os / driver agnostic so win10 win11 ok

97403

97404

Algo as follows:
If condition reached and ccd0 specified, then check current mem/cache activity > threshold and hysteresis reached, if fulfilled then switch
If condition reached and ccd1 specified, then check current mem/cache activity <=threshold and hysteresis reached,, if fulfilled then switch
Default hysteresis =4

Can combine multiple algos for ccd priority so combinations are wide

works on non x3d too but of course senseless on it. detailed explanation here.

 

2,425 Views
5,330 REPLIES 5,330

BitingChaos
Level 10

Tried 2604 on my X670E-A. 

My system shuts off with *any* EXPO setting enabled. The system then POSTs into "safe mode" and clears a bunch of settings. I could do 6400 on 2506, now I can't even hit 6000.

I'm trying to re-flash 2506 now. 

Same problem like most people reading this. Flashing back to 2506 is the only option. I tried for 20h all kind of settings and different RAM and bought now an other mobo. Not because 2506 is not stable, but because Asus releasing a BIOS knowing about the problem.

Ryzen 7950X3D & 9800X3D, Asus ROG 670E-E & MPG X870E Carbon Wifi, GSkill DDR5 2x32GB CL30 & 2x16GB CL28, 2 x ASUS TUF RTX4090 OC OG, ROG Swift Pro PG248QP and ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP, Razer Deathadder v3 Pro, Razer Huntsman v3 Pro mini, Custom Water-Cooling

herozero
Level 9

2506 is rock solid on my Strix X670E-F.  Standard EXPO profile, 7800X3D.Screenshot 2024-12-06 102915.png

9950X3D — Strix X670E-F — 2x16GB G.Skill 32GB kit (the black non-RGB EXPO stable Samsung ones) — RTX 5090 Astral — MPG 322URX QD-OLED — CPU + GPU blocks — Lian Li O11D XL-W

7800x3d was never a problem. The latency/aida issues affect 9000/x3d.

Ryzen 7950X3D & 9800X3D, Asus ROG 670E-E & MPG X870E Carbon Wifi, GSkill DDR5 2x32GB CL30 & 2x16GB CL28, 2 x ASUS TUF RTX4090 OC OG, ROG Swift Pro PG248QP and ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDP, Razer Deathadder v3 Pro, Razer Huntsman v3 Pro mini, Custom Water-Cooling

Not talking about any issues, just adding a general datapoint.  Thanks though.

9950X3D — Strix X670E-F — 2x16GB G.Skill 32GB kit (the black non-RGB EXPO stable Samsung ones) — RTX 5090 Astral — MPG 322URX QD-OLED — CPU + GPU blocks — Lian Li O11D XL-W

frenzyff
Level 11

Not everything here revolves around aida and/or latency stuff......

kx11
Level 10

Enabling resize bar disables all SSDs??

 

in CAPFRAMEx it says resize bar:Partial

Lord_Darkmoon
Level 8

I don't know if you guys saw this, but it could be an explanation for the latency issues:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/s/Sd1YwykEut

Basically it says the new BIOS function of "Core Tuning Config for Gaming" introduces wrong data for AIDA. 

The test just isn't indicative of true latency in every workload, which has always been the case - but these specific improvements make AIDA's current implementation less accurate. Fixating on one benchmark as an indication of absolute performance has never been the best approach. Perhaps, if anything, this will open people's eyes to testing more objectively when it comes to making changes to alter performance. We're talking about a matter of a few nanoseconds, which is unfathomably small regardless if the test is accurate or not.

9800X3D / 6400 CAS 28 / ROG X870 Crosshair / TUF RTX 4090

frenzyff
Level 11

is the core tuning option also for 7000x series? like 7950X3D?

Nvm just flashed to 2604 on 670E-Extreme. Works fine