X370 X470 AGESA 1003AB Bioses

[Shamino]

combo pi updated to AGESA 1003AB

c7h wifi
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ko4xdevtzlww5k8/ROG-CROSSHAIR-VII-HERO-WIFI-ASUS-2602.rar?dl=0

c7h
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mhlzozn54t028f9/ROG-CROSSHAIR-VII-HERO-ASUS-2602.rar?dl=0

c6e
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u8plr4u4kdip6lz/ROG-CROSSHAIR-VI-EXTREME-ASUS-7302.rar?dl=0

c6h wifi
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1qbjeargxh3hm5r/ROG-CROSSHAIR-VI-HERO-WIFI-AC-ASUS-7302.rar?dl=0

c6h
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6tvp5q0rs8tt4nx/CROSSHAIR-VI-HERO-ASUS-7302.rar?dl=0

X470 strix-I
https://www.dropbox.com/s/s80h82q78qmiyjf/ROG-STRIX-X470-I-GAMING-ASUS-2602.rar?dl=0

B450 Strix-I
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hx9rakw2dum19n4/ROG-STRIX-B450-I-GAMING-ASUS-2602.rar?dl=0

B450 Strix-F
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4wahhx7snd4omcc/ROG-STRIX-B450-F-GAMING-ASUS-2602.rar?dl=0

B450 Strix-E
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rhuea1xtoqbry9h/ROG-STRIX-B450-E-GAMING-ASUS-2602.rar?dl=0

[igralec84]

mikev190 wrote:
https://twitter.com/AMDRyzen/status/1168901636162539536

AMD confirmation of 1usmus tweet

Nice, looking forward to next week or whenever ASUS will implement those changes, probably AGESA 1.0.0.4?
But in the meantime, i'm on 2703+ since Sunday and haven't had a random BSOD/freeze since then, using same settings as 2703 except it was done via flashback. Only missing 25mhz single core boost on all cores compared to 50-125 from before.

[Max1mus91]

I wonder if I am only one who sees lower single core boosts with ram that goes above 3433? It basically limits it to about 4.2 to 4.1 all core clocks basically at almost all times if I go over 3433 ram with 1:1 ratio.

Once i go back to 3433 or lower I get my 45xx/44xx clock jumps from the 1st chiplet. But with higher clocked ram its like all of them are locked to 4.2.

All core clocks during r20 seem to be the same.

[EZ_PC_TECH]

Max1mus91 wrote:
I wonder if I am only one who sees lower single core boosts with ram that goes above 3433? It basically limits it to about 4.2 to 4.1 all core clocks basically at almost all times if I go over 3433 ram with 1:1 ratio.

Once i go back to 3433 or lower I get my 45xx/44xx clock jumps from the 1st chiplet. But with higher clocked ram its like all of them are locked to 4.2.

All core clocks during r20 seem to be the same.

Go to bios and set C-state and DF state to "enabled". Then make sure you are running Ryzen balanced plan and minimum processor state is 99% or below

[Zoart]

Not sure if this it the right topic to ask. But is there an ETA for the 1.0.0.3ABB bios update for the x470-F and prime? It has been a while now that it has been release for other boards or will it skip straight to the 1.0.0.3ABBA (which fixes boost?)

[SexySale85]

Zoart wrote:
Not sure if this it the right topic to ask. But is there an ETA for the 1.0.0.3ABB bios update for the x470-F and prime? It has been a while now that it has been release for other boards or will it skip straight to the 1.0.0.3ABBA (which fixes boost?)

Unfortunately, nothing for now. It's ignored for now, for some reason and none is shared with us. (Even B450-F got the update)

1. 5007 (1.0.0.2.) - Best boosts and OC. Bigger temperature limit, causing overheating. -> I use this one, however, maybe it will cause RMA.
2. 5204 (1.0.0.3 AB) - Less boosts and lowers OC headroom. Lowered temperature limit -> SKIP this one
3. 5XXX (1.0.0.3 ABB) - Less boosts and good OC headroom. Stable release. People praise this one for everything else expect boosts. -> Should be a good compensation for less boost but stable temperature.
4. 5XXX (1.0.0.X or ABBA) - We will see, but should be good to go!

[Zoart]

SexySale85 wrote:
Unfortunately, nothing for now. It's ignored for now, for some reason and none is shared with us. (Even B450-F got the update)

1. 5007 (1.0.0.2.) - Best boosts and OC. Bigger temperature limit, causing overheating. -> I use this one, however, maybe it will cause RMA.
2. 5204 (1.0.0.3 AB) - Less boosts and lowers OC headroom. Lowered temperature limit -> SKIP this one
3. 5XXX (1.0.0.3 ABB) - Less boosts and good OC headroom. Stable release. People praise this one for everything else expect boosts. -> Should be a good compensation for less boost but stable temperature.
4. 5XXX (1.0.0.X or ABBA) - We will see, but should be good to go!

That's kind of disappointing. I get the feeling that the X470-F and prime isn't getting as much love as the other motherboards they made. To me I'm more interested about stability and or improvements. But it's such a shame, like I don't even see beta bios for the X470-F.

And in a way it makes me afraid and sceptical about the future of the boards if they're taking this long or just being dismissive of the bios updates for certain boards.

[mvmiller12]

Zoart wrote:
That's kind of disappointing. I get the feeling that the X470-F and prime isn't getting as much love as the other motherboards they made. To me I'm more interested about stability and or improvements. But it's such a shame, like I don't even see beta bios for the X470-F.

And in a way it makes me afraid and sceptical about the future of the boards if they're taking this long or just being dismissive of the bios updates for certain boards.

When all the bugs get worked out with Matisse on the higher tier boards, I am absolutely certain that you guys will get an updated BIOS that jumps directly to "Works Great!" without all the crap in the middle we have gotten. Asus is still releasing occasional BIOS updates for my Prime B350-Plus, so I can't imagine they'd just stop on your X470-F.

[Zoart]

mvmiller12 wrote:
When all the bugs get worked out with Matisse on the higher tier boards, I am absolutely certain that you guys will get an updated BIOS that jumps directly to "Works Great!" without all the crap in the middle we have gotten. Asus is still releasing occasional BIOS updates for my Prime B350-Plus, so I can't imagine they'd just stop on your X470-F.

Yeah, but at least to -me- (not speaking for anyone else) it's disappointing to see a month or so pass by without an update while other boards have been receiving them regularly, even beta bios updates. But none the less, at the moment it's just wait and see what happens.

[PLTD89]

Tried setting an negative offset of -0.100v on the C6H with 3700X to see if temps would be better (below 85c with CB20). Managed to do one run, stock settings + PBO, temps perfect at 70c, but it started BSODing badly, even at the win 10 login screen.

Reverted to auto voltage, offset at stock seems broken.

[EZ_PC_TECH]

PLTD89 wrote:
Tried setting an negative offset of -0.100v on the C6H with 3700X to see if temps would be better (below 85c with CB20). Managed to do one run, stock settings + PBO, temps perfect at 70c, but it started BSODing badly, even at the win 10 login screen.

Reverted to auto voltage, offset at stock seems broken.

Try negative offset between -0.062 and -0.047 with LLC lvl 1. The offset more than that causing BSODs as you said.