Anybody noticed CPU Package Power (SMU) is reading wrong values on the C6H? It happens the same on rivatuner, it must be bios related.
I'm at ABB now, 2703, frequencies really took a hit. This is at Auto OC.
My good cluster reaching 4625MHz on three cores is now my bad cluster maxing out at 4350MHz. The bad cluster has less regression as it used to hit 4400MHz on two cores but now 4375MHz on two cores. Not logical.
Looks stable, all benchmarks runs, loosing some performance for example CB R20 multi now runs at 4050MHZ instead of 4075MHz with bios 2501. CPUZ has much worse single core, the 3900X now performs as a 3700X in single. CPUZ multi is only a little lower.
Memory is stable at 1900/1900/1900 3800MHz and booted at first try. Cinebench R20 is not much regression in multi score, but single is way worse down to 488! CB15 is the same multi, but single is once again as a 3700X. The single core frequency advantage of a 3900X is toally erased, multi is like only a 25MHZ regression and wont be noticed much.
To get any performance out of this bios Auto is a POS, you need manual or per-CCX OC. Probably why it is implemented in bios for C8H. Would be nice with the same for C7H.
Difference in memory between the two bioses, the same settings both tested today:
My good cluster reaching 4625MHz on three cores is now my bad cluster maxing out at 4350MHz. The bad cluster has less regression as it used to hit 4400MHz on two cores but now 4375MHz on two cores. Not logical.
Looks stable, all benchmarks runs, loosing some performance for example CB R20 multi now runs at 4050MHZ instead of 4075MHz with bios 2501. CPUZ has much worse single core, the 3900X now performs as a 3700X in single. CPUZ multi is only a little lower.
Memory is stable at 1900/1900/1900 3800MHz and booted at first try. Cinebench R20 is not much regression in multi score, but single is way worse down to 488! CB15 is the same multi, but single is once again as a 3700X. The single core frequency advantage of a 3900X is toally erased, multi is like only a 25MHZ regression and wont be noticed much.
To get any performance out of this bios Auto is a POS, you need manual or per-CCX OC. Probably why it is implemented in bios for C8H. Would be nice with the same for C7H.
Difference in memory between the two bioses, the same settings both tested today:
xeizo wrote:
I'm at ABB now, 2703, frequencies really took a hit. This is at Auto OC.
My good cluster reaching 4625MHz on three cores is now my bad cluster maxing out at 4350MHz. The bad cluster has less regression as it used to hit 4400MHz on two cores but now 4375MHz on two cores. Not logical.
Looks stable, all benchmarks runs, loosing some performance for example CB R20 multi now runs at 4050MHZ instead of 4075MHz with bios 2501. CPUZ has much worse single core, the 3900X now performs as a 3700X in single. CPUZ multi is only a little lower.
Memory is stable at 1900/1900/1900 3800MHz and booted at first try. Cinebench R20 is not much regression in multi score, but single is way worse down to 488! CB15 is the same multi, but single is once again as a 3700X. The single core frequency advantage of a 3900X is toally erased, multi is like only a 25MHZ regression and wont be noticed much.
To get any performance out of this bios Auto is a POS, you need manual or per-CCX OC. Probably why it is implemented in bios for C8H. Would be nice with the same for C7H.
Difference in memory between the two bioses, the same settings both tested today:
How do you have so high Write speed? We should normally see ~3100GBPS with 3800Mhz on Ryzen 3700X.
Also, my single core is 509 with 3700X, so your CPU is badly underperforming. Try those steps that I posted earlier. https://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?112279-X370-X470-AGESA-1003AB-Bioses/page71#post782128
I think your issue is a drop in SOC voltage if it set to Auto. LLC5 + 0.05 offset(to 1.156) improved my score significantly
