cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO(WI-FI) BIOS 2204/2206 - Follow-up

slice313
Level 7
After the disastrous 2010-2103 BIOS, we finally get to test the 2204/2206 BIOS!

__________________________________________
ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO BIOS 2204
"-Update AMD AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.0.8.0
-Improve system performance.
-Improve system stability
-Improve M.2 storage compatibility
-Improve DRAM stability
_________________________________________

I will be trying it out today and reporting back to this thread. I thought it would be nice to have a clean thread, just for the 2204 BIOS, to keep things tidy.

Have fun tinkering with it 😉
618 Views
28 REPLIES 28

Attention 🙂

I found something that could be really interesting to all of us who are suffering random restarts with the newer BIOS.

I am talking about the "CCD/IOD VDDG" voltages. If you are using values such as "1.050" or "1.000" or lower, try bumping up the voltage to "1.075" for both.

Meanwhile, I recommend leaving the "SOC" at "1.1" and the "Vddp" to "0.950". That´s all. (Vddp is extreme sensitive, too low will crash, too high will crash, leave it at 0.950 unless you know what you are doing)

My "random restarts" seems to have disappeared after increasing sightly the voltages for CCD/IOD VDDG, please if you are having this issue, try and report back. You maybe need a couple of days, or even more, to be 100% sure this have fixed the issue. I have been testing for 3 days now.

Hi, I recently switched from 1201 to 2204 and my memory still won't run at its rated settings ( Gskill Trident z neo F4-3600C16Q-64GTZN Samsung B-die). Instead it runs at 3466 cl 14-15-14-34. I set the memory voltage to 1.37v for extra stability. Maybe my CPU can't handle 3600 on the memory, because 3466 ran 2x12h of memtest86 just fine.
So far no restarts or other problems (knock on wood).

Barryboy
Level 7
MY system: 3900X
Crosshair Hero VIII
Asus 2080 ti
Corsair 32GB 3600MHZ memory
RMI 850 Power Supply
Lian LI 011 Dynamic
Fully water cooled (Corsair Hydro X)

Upgraded to bios 2204 and I have major issues. Random BSOD, unstable game play,
When I try to use DOCP for the rated speed my pc won't even boot, it shows 22 on the QLED
So for now the only way to get into windows is having the memory run at 2666 MHZ and leave everything on default on the bios....

Any advice would be welcome, but I'm having the worst experience since I installed my system last year August. There is definitely something wrong with this BIOS...

squirrito
Level 7
Just noticed there is a new BIOS version for Crosshair VIII Wi-Fi published today, just minutes ago! Bios version is 2206, release notes are identical to BIOS version 2204 so unclear what is changed. Might dive in and test now...

Edit 1: Initial results not promising. Booted into 2206 with optimized defaults, but had a BSOD minutes afterwards without any heavy load. Minidump is non-specific, just says ntoskrnl.exe. Applied DOCP which for my 4x8GB CL14 3600Mhz Samsung b-die kit has a rated voltage of 1.45v. I noticed in both the BIOS and HWInfo that DRAM voltage is measured lower than that, between 1.44 and 1.48v. Have not crashed yet, but a 3dmark stress test failed which is not a good sign....

Edit 2: Bumped XMP voltage a bit from 1.45v (XMP) to 1.46v, and things seem a bit more stable? Have been gaming for a couple of hours without BSOD at least, although game crashed to desktop once. Not sure if related or just a Tarkov issue....

squirrito wrote:
Just noticed there is a new BIOS version for Crosshair VIII Wi-Fi published today, just minutes ago! Bios version is 2206, release notes are identical to BIOS version 2204 so unclear what is changed. Might dive in and test now...

Edit 1: Initial results not promising. Booted into 2206 with optimized defaults, but had a BSOD minutes afterwards without any heavy load. Minidump is non-specific, just says ntoskrnl.exe. Applied DOCP which for my 4x8GB CL14 3600Mhz Samsung b-die kit has a rated voltage of 1.45v. I noticed in both the BIOS and HWInfo that DRAM voltage is measured lower than that, between 1.44 and 1.48v. Have not crashed yet, but a 3dmark stress test failed which is not a good sign....

Edit 2: Bumped XMP voltage a bit from 1.45v (XMP) to 1.46v, and things seem a bit more stable? Have been gaming for a couple of hours without BSOD at least, although game crashed to desktop once. Not sure if related or just a Tarkov issue....




Hello,

By looking too hard at VDIMM readings you are leading yourself up the garden path. If you need to apply more voltage for stability, than by all means apply it. However, the amount of vdroop you are seeing here will be low enough to be considered non-existent.

There will be enough noise to mask how little droop there is unless using the proper measurement tool with an adequate resolution, as the UEFI reading is being taken on the power plane. A physical measurement would be required from the socket to eliminate any impedance/power plan related errors.

It is more likely that a change in memory ruling between BIOS builds is causing instability. Increasing VDIMM will often drown that out, this isn't anything new or untoward.
13900KS / 8000 CAS36 / ROG APEX Z790 / ROG TUF RTX 4090

Silent Scone@ASUS wrote:
Hello,

By looking too hard at VDIMM readings you are leading yourself up the garden path. If you need to apply more voltage for stability, than by all means apply it. However, the amount of vdroop you are seeing here will be low enough to be considered non-existent.

There will be enough noise to mask how little droop there is unless using the proper measurement tool with an adequate resolution, as the UEFI reading is being taken on the power plane. A physical measurement would be required from the socket to eliminate any impedance/power plane related errors.

It is more likely that a change in memory ruling between BIOS builds is causing instability, increasing VDIMM will often drown that out, this isn't anything new or untoward.


You said that so many times that this start to be boring 😉 But to honestly, I would agree with you except from BIOS'es 2xxx increasing voltage fixes the stability issue that didn't exist in e.g. 1302. So there must be something with DRAM voltage.

BIOS 2206 - the same issues that I have in 2xxx series.

tommy7600 wrote:
You said that so many times that this start to be boring 😉 But to honestly, I would agree with you except from BIOS'es 2xxx increasing voltage fixes the stability issue that didn't exist in e.g. 1302. So there must be something with DRAM voltage.


If you find it boring, feel free to present some evidence to the contrary as I mentioned to you in the other thread 🙂

See the latter part of my above post, increasing VDIMM is a remedy for drowning out all kinds of stability issues. If you wish to waste your time pursuing something such as vdroop on memory rather than dialing out the instability yourself, there isn't much more to say, Tommy.

Having had this board in my personal system since launch, I'm not having any difficulties stabalising anything I have done in previous builds. That isn't to say some memory rulings have not changed.
13900KS / 8000 CAS36 / ROG APEX Z790 / ROG TUF RTX 4090

Silent Scone@ASUS wrote:
If you find it boring, feel free to present some evidence to the contrary as I mentioned to you in the other thread 🙂

See the latter part of my above post, increasing VDIMM is a remedy for drowning out all kinds of stability issues. If you wish to waste your time pursuing something such as vdroop on memory rather than dialing out the instability yourself, there isn't much more to say, Tommy.

Having had this board in my personal system since launch, I'm not having any difficulties stabalising anything I have done in previous builds. That isn't to say some memory rulings have not changed.


Currently I have stable system by simply setting the voltage to 1.36V. BUT I would like to simply use DOCP profile that sets the voltage to 1.35V as I could do in 1302 without issues.

Barryboy
Level 7
2206 was releases, installed and I was able to boot into Windows 10 right away with DOCP enabled. I will do further testing and see if I'm able to do my normal memory overclock to have better timings. But so far so good...at least for the first hour 🙂