05-21-2017 10:54 PM
05-21-2017 11:48 PM
entropic-remnants wrote:
[sigh] I really did say I wasn't trying the 994x bios any further. I had played with 9943 without much luck.
But I saw a guy with basically the same RAM I have (Corsair Dominator Platinum CMD16GX4M2B3200C16) that has the e-die chips and he posted some shots from Thaiphoon Burner that had me thinking. He was able to use the actually speed strapping for his RAM with no Bclk overclock. I've never been able to make that work on any BIOS.
Left the CPU at default (no overclock), set the memory voltages and tried it with the 3200 strap. Fail. Looked to see if the standard memory timings from my chip set had loaded. No, changed the strap to 2133, changed it back to 3200 and it still wasn't 16-18-18-18-36 like it should be but was 15-15-15-15-34. Strange.
Set the proper "standard" timings manually. Fail again. But the new BIOS gives you access to other timings and I began to suspect they aren't being read from my chips right either.
So I looked at Thaiphoon for my set and got some info printed out. First off Thaiphoon doesn't know what type of Samsung die is. I know it's e-die from other sources.
Looking at the last page of the Thaiphoon report I'm looking a a bunch of timings that you couldn't access in previous BIOS. I noticed that the following timings mentioned in Thaiphoon are available (although they have like SM after them) in the Crosshair memory timings. Here is what they were in Thaiphoon for my sticks.
tRC (active to active refresh) = 54T
tFAW (four activate window delay time) = 36T
tRRD_S (short activate to activate delay time) = 6T
tRRD_L (long activate to activate delay time) = 9T
When I looked at those numbers in the BIOS they didn't match at all just like the basic timings didn't. So I manually set them to what was in Thaiphoon for my RAM.
I also took a cue from what I've been reading over on overclock.net and set the new "Gear Down" mode to "disabled", set the command rate to 2T, and my ProcODT ended up optimum at 80 ohms this time. 1.4 volts on the DRAM at boot and running, 1.1 SOC and 1.05 SB.
The result? RAM that boots cold or a restart with no issues at 3200. No Bclk overclock. All testing says it's good.
Now is this a success? Yes and no.
Yes, my DDR4 is running at 3200 mhz. But without access to those settings in the new BIOS I wouldn't.
The real failure to my mind is this: Why can Thaiphoon burner easily read my timings but the Crosshair BIOS can't? Isn't reading the SPD data the most basic of functions? How is it that it can't read timings that it knows about already from a stick that has that data in it?
The more I dig into this stuff, the more confused I am about the problems that are occuring. If I can read a report from a piece of FREEWARE for heaven's sake and put the numbers in why can't the BIOS? And why is Asus doing all this over on overclock rather than here? And does the stork really bring babies?
Anyway, after the mem was fine I put the pstate overclock back in and it's all running well. 3.8 ghz cpu and full speed 3200 mhz memory. Feck any memory overclock I'm just glad to have it running reliably at spec.
9945 has been the best BIOS so far with it's adjustability, but not it's adaptability. It still has no idea how to read the timings properly from a lot of memory sticks as shown by the folks having to tweak stuff the BIOS should handle with ease.
Sheesh, Asus.
05-23-2017 08:24 AM
Demoniacstar wrote:
so i also looked at this ..thanks for bringing it to light ... i use Aida64 for every thing ...cuz i dont like several programs to do the same thing....
and the company behind aida64 just rocks ....
but i checked out this other timings and it seems my ram also has wrong timings in every thing else
i am going to go reset all these to the right settings and see what happens
edit/update ...i looked into these other settings ...and as i suspected it worked janky for my ram ....
most all settings took ..cept im running my main timings tighter then XMP 3000 profile suggests so i think that's a plus
i also took a look at TRFC-TRFC2-TRFC4...in bios those settings are much more tighter then the xmp timings suggest upon changing them just those three to xmp timings i could not boot.............i set them back to the lower settings they were auto tuned to...
im going to see what happens and how things look going even lower on those timings....
05-24-2017 08:26 PM
05-24-2017 08:38 PM
syldon wrote:
I looked at buying this "aida64 extreme". I looked at the version options with the comparison page, it states that the extreme version does not look at dram timings?
https://www.aida64.com/compare-aida64-features
The only reason I would buy this is for dram timings to configure my memory.
Can you throw some light on this before I purchase, cheers.
05-24-2017 08:39 PM
syldon wrote:
I looked at buying this "aida64 extreme". I looked at the version options with the comparison page, it states that the extreme version does not look at dram timings?
https://www.aida64.com/compare-aida64-features
The only reason I would buy this is for dram timings to configure my memory.
Can you throw some light on this before I purchase, cheers.
05-24-2017 08:58 PM
Demoniacstar wrote:
if you look at that pic in my last post you will see ram timings......as reported by Aida64 extreme 😉
05-25-2017 09:19 AM
05-25-2017 09:23 AM
Demoniacstar wrote:
i don't push...lol....
05-22-2017 05:25 AM