03-17-2017 05:21 AM
03-01-2018 05:55 PM
looncraz wrote:
The 'subjective' feel would almost certainly be a result of lower latency allowing updates to occur on screen just a little faster, but allowing the update to occur on an entirely earlier frame (modern OSes use compositing, so they act like games in their rendering behavior).
If you are running 60hz on the desktop, then you are moving from having completion on-screen by 16.7ms - which you can absolutely feel. If you took 16.8ms to compute something before, you wouldn't see it for 33.4ms... but, now, computing it in 16.6ms, you see it twice as quickly.
The old way of rendering (direct) allowed you to feel a 10% performance increase in everything you did. But, now, you need BIG changes to feel it everywhere... but, once you get close, it only takes a tiny bit extra to put you over the top - the changes are accumulative.
Using 120hz refresh rate on the desktop allows you to feel the performance jumps even better, but you still have 8ms chunks of time.
03-02-2018 10:43 AM
03-02-2018 11:42 AM
sbakic wrote:
Guys I have one more question.
On BIOS 1701, with default and overclocked cpu/ram, fast boot and csm off, when I turn on my pc from 'shut down' state and watch q-codes on motherboard there is no repetition between codes. And colors goes as: orange, red, white, green.
But with 3008 and 3502 BIOS only when I overclock cpu/ram and turn on pc, I see that it repeat some codes. Color goes as: orange, red, orange red, white green. When it come to 3b q-code (red color), it start from start and after that normal sequence.
Is it a bug or it is supposed to be like that? It even happens in 3008 , 3502 when I change turn off fast boot and csm off, so I dont need to overclock it.
03-02-2018 11:53 AM
Clouseau wrote:
iirc 1701 did not have the cold boot fix included. Think the cold boot fix was not included again till 3008 and has been part of the bios releases since.
02-28-2018 12:15 PM
02-28-2018 02:20 PM
03-01-2018 01:50 PM
Darth Ender wrote:
If people are doubting the truth of what you are saying, throw some phoronix or similar benchmarks up that test the system instead of just graphics or one subsystem and it should be pretty clear when all you change is the ram speed that performance is improved significantly.
No need to rely on feelings and it shuts everyone up.
03-02-2018 04:47 PM
Clouseau wrote:
How can one get phoronix test suite to run under Windows 10? Downloaded what Git Hub had to offer and also the PHP files from Windows.PHP.Net and was a no go. Do not use Linux and no time is being devoted to the Windows platform due to unpopularity. Any help or guidance would be appreciated.
03-03-2018 06:45 PM