cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

ASUS B550-F Gaming (BIOS 3621) – Per-Core CO lowers all-core boost vs All-Core CO

s-o-p
Level 7

Hi everyone,

I’m seeing a consistent and reproducible difference between All-Core and Per-Core Curve Optimizer behavior on my system and I’m trying to find out if this is BIOS-specific or expected AGESA behavior.

System

  • CPU: Ryzen 7 5800X

  • Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F Gaming (non-WiFi)

  • BIOS: 3621

  • AGESA: ComboAM4v2 (as reported in BIOS)

  • Cooling: sufficient (no thermal throttling)

Settings (baseline)

  • PBO: enabled / stock limits

  • Scalar: 1×

  • Boost override: 0 MHz

  • LLC: Level 3

  • RAM: DOCP 3600, FCLK 1800

Observed behavior

1) All-Core Curve Optimizer

  • All cores set to −27

  • OCCT stable

  • All-core boost under load: ~4700–4750 MHz

  • No WHEA errors

2) Per-Core Curve Optimizer

  • All cores individually set to −27

  • OCCT stable

  • All-core boost under load drops to ~4400 MHz

  • Same behavior regardless of whether I adjust the strongest or weakest core (e.g. −30 on a single core still results in ~4400 MHz)

So even with identical numeric offsets, Per-Core CO consistently results in a much lower all-core frequency than All-Core CO.

What I’m trying to find out

  • Has anyone with this exact board (or similar ASUS B550/X570) tested other BIOS versions where Per-Core CO behaves identically to All-Core CO under all-core load?

  • In other words:
    All-Core −27 ≈ Per-Core all −27 in terms of all-core frequency (~4.7 GHz), not ~4.4 GHz.

I understand that Per-Core CO is mainly for single-core optimization, but I’m specifically interested in whether this frequency drop is a BIOS/AGESA implementation issue, or if there are known versions where this behavior was different.

Any concrete BIOS version references or firsthand test results would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

205 Views
0 REPLIES 0